居住在核電廠周圍會減少的壽命時間[]
Bernard L. Cohen-THE NUCLEAR ENERGY OPTION 第8章-UNDERSTANDING RISK
在各種風險下所平均損失的壽命
LOSS OF LIFE EXPECTANCY (LLE) DUE TO VARIOUS RISKS[]
| TABLE 1 | ||
| Activity or risk
|
LLE (days) | |
|---|---|---|
| Living in poverty | 3500 | |
| Being male (vs. female) | 2800 | |
| Cigarettes (male) | 2300 | |
| Heart disease* | 2100 | |
| Being unmarried | 2000 | |
| Being black (vs. white) | 2000 | |
| Socioeconomic status low | 1500 | |
| Working as a coal miner | 1100 | |
| Cancer* | 980 | |
| 30-lb overweight | 900 | |
| Grade school dropout | 800 | |
| Sub-optimal medical care* | 550 | |
| Stroke* | 520 | |
| 15-lb overweight | 450 | |
| All accidents* | 400 | |
| Vietnam army service | 400 | |
| Living in Southeast (SC,MS,GA,LA,AL) | 350 | |
| Mining construction (accidents only) | 320 | |
| Alcohol* | 230 | |
| Motor vehicle accidents | 180 | |
| Pneumonia, influenza* | 130 | |
| Drug abuse* | 100 | |
| Suicide* | 95 | |
| Homicide* | 90 | |
| Air pollution* | 80 | |
| Occupational accidents | 74 | |
| AIDS* | 70 | |
| Small cars (vs. midsize) | 60 | |
| Married to smoker | 50 | |
| Drowning* | 40 | |
| Speed limit: 65 vs. 55 miles per hour* | 40 | |
| Falls* | 39 | |
| Poison + suffocation + asphyxiation* | 37 | |
| Radon in homes* | 35 | |
| Fire, burns* | 27 | |
| Coffee: 2 cups/day | 26 | |
| Radiation worker, age 18-65 | 25 | |
| Firearms* | 11 | |
| Birth control pills | 5 | |
| All electricity nuclear (UCS)* | 1.5 | |
| Peanut butter (1 Tbsp./day) | 1.1 | |
| Hurricanes, tornadoes* | 1 | |
| Airline crashes* | 1 | |
| Dam failures* | 1 | |
| Living near nuclear plant | 0.4 | |
| All electricity nuclear (NRC)* | 0.04 | |
根據Living near nuclear plant的LLE為0.4並以一天24小時換算0.4x24=9.6(小時)
終身住在核能電廠周圍的壽命損失是以輻射生物效應對應每1西弗預期造成的風險損失，再以核能電廠周圍累積輻射劑量歸一化處理[]
網站：Bernard L. Cohen-THE NUCLEAR ENERGY OPTION (1990)
如果要把做成長條圖 可以看G. Tyler Miller跟Scott Spoolman 的Environmental Science: Problems, Connections and Solutions，來源同樣也是引用自這本書
在第14章就有提到(此為2008版本，可能會有誤差)
各條件下平均減少的壽命